Unless you have been living under a rock, you have seen, heard, and interacted with Generative AI in the workplace. To boot, nearly every company is saying something to the effect of “our AI platform can help achieve better results, faster,” making it very confusing to know who is for real and who is simply riding the massive tidal wave that is Generative AI. This is only exacerbated in cybersecurity where we find a plethora of companies touting AI capabilities, and/or the ability to lend a hand in securing and governing AI. However, this extraneous noise muddies the issue of what is top of mind for so many CISOs and security teams, which is enabling the business to use Generative AI themselves in order to optimize productivity, automate processes, and much more.
In this blog, we’ll make some distinctions between the different types of AI security to help you make sense of it all so you can improve security without hindering business processes.
The first, and likely the most common approach that security teams are taking to AI is verbiage around how their products, services, and platforms are driven by AI. AI-driven platforms are ones that use AI to do things like:
While important, the vast majority of these tools do not actually aid in the security of the AI tools and platforms themselves, such as Microsoft Copilot Studio, Salesforce, ServiceNow, OpenAI, and more. What is clear is the value of Gen AI, where enterprise teams are injecting it into their own products and services, which leads to the next needed layer of security.
Other security teams are focused on securing the actual AI model or tool itself. If someone is able to ‘poison the well’ of data that the AI model is processing in order to function, the answers and functionality of the AI can be skewed. Securing an AI or large language model (LLM) involves implementing measures to protect it from various potential threats. Here are some key considerations for a security team focusing on securing the AI/LLM itself:
By addressing these aspects, a security team can enhance the overall security posture of the AI/LLM and minimize the risks associated with its deployment and operation. However, these controls help to secure the actual AI/LLM itself, but fail to take into account the things that people can build using AI.
As Generative AI takes enterprises by storm, more and more people are using Generative AI in their development processes. This is no longer just limited to professional developers either, as citizen developers are building apps, automations, data flows, and more by simply asking a Copilot to build it. And much like when someone uses ChatGPT for assistance in writing, say, a blog, or a sales email, an application will require human inspection after the auto-generation in order to make sure it fits the context, processes, and critically, security protocols.
Here are some things to consider for security teams when trying to integrate application security controls to the world of Generative AI.
This is a new frontier that continues to evolve, seemingly by the day. Here at Zenity, we’re focused on helping our customers empower professional and citizen developers to build useful apps, automations, and business processes without needing to write custom code. As Generative AI makes its way into all of these different platforms, the need for centralized visibility, risk assessment, and governance has never been more important to keep up with the speed and volume of business-led development. Come chat with us to learn how we might be able to help!
All ArticlesIf you’ve started exploring how to secure AI agents in your environment (or even just reading about it), you likely...
Welcome to the Agentic AI revolution, where AI Agents aren’t just processing information; they’re making decisions,...
Representing Zenity in Washington DC I recently had the fantastic opportunity to represent Zenity in a round of...
We’d love to chat with you about how your team can secure and govern AI Agents everywhere.
Book Demo